Advertisement
www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009...71390.shtml
Ray is a charlatan who plays with people's lives. When people became sick during his sweat lodge he told them not to leave. Three people died due to Ray's ego and greed. I am going to pray that his next book is about the secret of surviving life in a prison cell.
abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall...doned/story
I am glad his books are being delayed: www.google.com/hostednews...vgD9BJMPHG0
Horray! Second family to sue con artist: www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/new..._25_2009
Ray is a charlatan who plays with people's lives. When people became sick during his sweat lodge he told them not to leave. Three people died due to Ray's ego and greed. I am going to pray that his next book is about the secret of surviving life in a prison cell.
abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall...doned/story
I am glad his books are being delayed: www.google.com/hostednews...vgD9BJMPHG0
Horray! Second family to sue con artist: www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/new..._25_2009
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 8:37 AMJames Ray is not a Guru. He did make a mistake. I don't agree the people died because of greed but do agree that his ego likely played a part. Remember, many of us get who we are so I would be mindful of what you pray for. I feel confident Mr. Ray is being shown a part of who he is but I don't know if I am ready to make an announcement that I believe he wittingly "intended" this to happen. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 11:27 AMit is also ironic that Joe Vitale's ad is showing right next to this post. The universe works in mysterious ways. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 1:28 PMNo irony involved. It is the laws of attraction. One scam artist attracts other scamers. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 5:54 PMFunny! hahahahaha!
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 1:47 PM-Hubris said: "I would be mindful of what you pray for."
Indeed. I am mindful that when I pray that Ray faces serious consequences for his reckless actions. In fact several of us in another tribe are praying for the same thing. Mr. Ray is ripping off Native American traditions in order to make a quick buck from gullible people. Real Native Americans would not charge even a dime for people to attend a REAL sweat lodge.
Mr. Ray should get no special consideration merely because he claims to be practicing spirituality. The situation is no different than if someone tried to conduct a secular sweat lodge and then discocuraged or prevented people who were falling ill from leaving. I feel no affinity at all with Mr. Ray. Other gurus, shamans and spiritual healers should not hesitate for one minute to call him out for his lack of responsibility.
My prayers for him to face legal and civil sanctions are done with the upmost intention. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 3:01 PMharold: hmmm I'd be mindful. and I hope you aren't the kind of person who supposedly "believes" everything happens for a reason: If you are wishing serious consequences upon this guy Ray, you are saying that everything doesn't happen for a reason, and we need to step in and solve this justice ourselves.
As for this topic itself, I think it brings up an interesting point, where do you look for teaching spirits? Inside friends or close people to you (ie. people inside your "real" tribe), or do you go for an institution/ classroom type of mentality to learn this stuff. Where do you find your teacher? If you have one. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 4:24 PMWow, what a sleaze! This story has everything in it that I dislike about the Secret, from
materialism to
misappropriated and out of context indigenous and ancient practices to
false profits(sic) to
gullibly externalizing your enlightenment to
inaction to
lack of accountability -
wrapped into one horrible little package...
I wouldn't expect much better from someone like Ray, but its still tragic.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 4:29 PMThe deaths of three people happened for a reason. The reason was that Mr. Ray actually believes he is important and that what he says is so important that people should not leave a situation that is endangering their lives. Strip away all of the ersatz spirituality of Mr. Ray and you have a con artist. That SOME things happen for a reason is no reason give Ray a free pass for being an irresponsible asshole.
I learn from all sorts of people. The lessons I learn from friends or teaching spirits are no less important than classrooms and institutions.
I have learned to avoid the mentality that says everything happens for a reason. Sometimes things are just senseless. The universe does have laws like gravity that govern it, but I see no evidence of any grand plan. The very presence of humans on Earth was not predestined. The fact that Earth has an atmosphere and surface water was the result of a series of random events that were not part of any plan. The dinosaurs were wiped out by a random accident and by another series of random accidents humans emerged. It did not have to be so. You and me are here due to the random meeting of our parents and the chance mingling of an egg and sperm.
The senseless deaths of three people, three people who were every bit as important as Mr. Ray can have some meaning if lessons are learned. Hopefully people will think twice before they get taken in by the likes of a James Ray. Maybe people will learn that they do not need to fork over thousands of dollars to gain wisdom. I hope that con artists like Mr. Ray find it more difficult to con people out of their money (and now their very lives) Traditional teachers are not in it for the money nor do they make the pursuit of riches a sacrament.
I would ask Mr. Ray where he found his teacher. Apparently at the school of trite platitudes from what I read about him.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 4:47 PMJivatma, I believe you have gotten to the heart of it. Where we go for wisdom and growth. And in this case, the assumption that a higher dollar value somehow insure spiritual, ethical, and practical value. Where are our values.
And the other question about this post specically, herold, is why are any of us so quickly inclined to wish ill on another? It all comes from the same mistaken idea that we are seperate and that what any of us endures has nothing to do with the rest of us except as entertainment.
My prayers are that we know what any of us emdures we all endure and that we can as easily come away with wisdom as anger or prayers for justice or vengeance. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 5:12 PMWhile it is clear that money and materialism are huge motivating factors for Ray and his adherents, I'd caution saying such things like "A true spiritual teacher would never charge for a sweat lodge".
Those who make such ceremonies available do so at some cost to themselves, and while in some cases a non-cash offering will suffice for attendees, it is very arrogant and immature to assume that the ceremony keeper should incur all the costs themselves.
Guests should pitch in. And in our culture, money is the de facto unit of trade. So if they need wood for the fire, gas for their car/truck/generator, food for their guests, electricity for their lights, if you expect them to share their ritual with you then don't be surprised if they expect some cash from you.
Now, charging $9000 bucks like the sleazebag in question, when he doesn't even come from that tradition, thats a whole different thing. Mr. Ray clearly is all about the money, as it states on his website. Just remember that asking for contributions does not disqualify a person's teaching, especially when they cover that person's costs to provide their experience.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 5:15 PMWhy is the desire for justice being labeled as wishing ill on another? My question is how can anyone let Mr. Ray off the hook? Three people are dead and some people think this is incidental. As if Mr. Ray is an important person who should not be bothered with the consequences of his actions. Do you suggest there should be no investigation? Should the families of the victims (and I challenge you to say they were not victims) just shut up and say "this was meant to be" or some such drivel?
This irresponsible little business man, James Ray had plastic tarps covering a sweat lodge. He told people who were getting sick to stay put, Some reports say his staff tried to prevent people from leaving. No spiritual concept is worth risking the lives of other people. Mr. Ray thinks he should be able to continue with no questions asked. Who the hell does he think he is?
Yes I hope an pray along with others that he has to pay through the nose. I am glad his book deals are off and I hope he has to face charges. I would encourage the families to press lawsuits against him and I hope they drain Mr. Ray's wealth. He does not deserve his millions. To hell with James Arthur Ray for offering gthe families of the victims half of their fee back. Sue the bastard! -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 5:49 PMp.s. as for "The Secret" after reading it I agreed with the review that said "The Secret is like Amway for the soul."
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 8:20 PMYou can pray for justice if you want, I'm not saying you can't. And I'm not** saying this Ray guy is a good egg. I'm saying, you could spend your sacred energy on something more constructive like healing people, on nurturing yourself and those in your circle of life, instead. I didn't mean anything against you harold.
I have heard of using plastic tarps to cover sweat lodges though, I have even seen plans online, calling for it. I think it's fairly common practice to use tarps in a sweat lodge, if not maybe I am misinformed too. haven't built one myself as of yet, but I have read of them here and there. This guy is no doubt using people and himself, BUT! he gets it back, by way of a lack of satisfaction with life, he needs to keep stealing and stealing. Unfortunately, there's a million more people like him, people you may worship yourself, in your own way, without knowing it.
Take for instance Stop and Shop and their Natures Promise Organic Milk: seems off topic but this USDA certified stuff actually uses factory farming milk! and packages it "Organic" through some loophole in the law. Yet there's people out in the world who are worshipping stop and plop (and other corporations) and think that it's turning over a new leaf. Calling it a "new era" for corporations! unfortunately people don't realize it's obviously all a sham like this Ray guy. But if you didn't see through to the heart of this guy, that's your fault. If you can't use logic and realize that Stop and Shop can't possibly stock every aisle of every store with some form of organic foods, without cheating *big-time, well join the club... Sorry to be so kurt about this but you seem to misunderstand my perspective! People taking advantage of eachother is very frustrating and I know exactly where you are coming from with your aggravation. I just don't see how spending your energy spreading human created justice solves anything. People get what they deserve, me, you, everyone, no matter what. It's just whether you have eyes to see it or not.
I'm not saying you drink natures promise milk or that you care about Labels meaning what they are supposed to mean, I'm just giving an example of how this kind of thing happens all over the board game of this system of "justice" we live in. and it is a game. There's plenty of people who do what this Ray guy did, taking advantage of people. I don't think you should waste your energy praying on this one guy is all I am saying. I don't even know if you should pray on anyone else either, I tried it for a long time and it didnt do anything : (... the only thing that can overcome hurt, is to heal. Keep your energy, or prayers, as you call them. Don't send it out toward this Ray dufus.
I didn't think you'd take my first comment the wrong way, I'm sorry harold, I should not have assumed you would understand what I was talking about without me elaborating more on what I said.
Peace Man, -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 10:39 PMI believe Mr. Ray is guilty of manslaughter. This tragedy could have been avoided had someone in the group been aware how and why sweat lodges are held. Sweat lodge ceremonies have nothing to do with detoxing from the steam as he supposedly stated. When I read that it really pissed me off. The man has no right to be leading a sweat lodge. A sweat lodge is a sacred space to receive healing and messages from spirits through the actions of a medicine man or shaman. The steam is a distraction because being too aware of what is being healed can interfere with the process. The hot stones also serve to allow the shaman to burn herbs needed in the ceremony. How in the heck did he ever get people to pay that much money? I'm in shock over this. Aloha, Kahuna Lamaku.
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 5:48 PMI am in agreement with Jivatma and Embrace however there is truth in all of the replies. Harold, the truth you are speaking of requires no armor yet you show up armed and dangerous. All tribes are real even Mr. Rays tribe even if for it's own sake. The fatal flaw in Mr. Ray's plan was the act of Hubris. His attempt to upstage the gods was met with a number of wacks and thacks which is meant to humble the mind. I have hopes that he will recognize the truth of what is being shown to him.
As far as charging for services or knowledge, it is an age old story. His practice appeals to a monetary system. It is what it is. Try not to get too hung up on people charging money for the services they believe they provide. The people who participate in those rituals remind me of what one Tibetan Lama once said, "As long as there is ignorance, there is a need for ritual. It is a ladder that may be discarded once we have attained a certain level of spiritual development."
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 2:53 AMWhere do you find your teacher?
Yourself by reflection' be observant'
No one can harm you unless you give them power to do so !
Recycle kickeck !!
Bliss!
Nobu +
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 6:21 PMTo me it is another example of how we must ALL take more responsibility for ourselves and each other. Why is it if people were becoming ill did not ONE of those people help them? Why didn't they help themselves?
Why is it of all the people involved in that event not one knew the physical dangers of not proper ventilating (natural breathable covers)? Why is it not one person knew the physical signs of danger in those circumstances?
I see it a lot. People have tourists come and participate in some spiritual practice, ceremony, event, and they don't know basic first aid. They don't know where or how far the local hospital is. They are completely ignorant about the potential dangers. Still people go and they don't ask. They don't take charge of their own health and well being. As long as I remain ignorant and careless about my own safety, others can easily take advantage.
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 7:42 PMThree people died? And that's tragic? Blink, and so did three more. Blink, and it happened again, and again, and again.
There is no death. There is a recycling program in place however. You and everyone you know and everyone they know are in it.
No escape. No pill to take. No need to get upset. No way to avoid it.
It just is, and that's not death. Do I know everything? No, but just because I'm unaware of the mystical particulars as to the distribution of particles and their reassembly doesn't mean I can't see it happening as a process.
Your mad because you think someones time was stolen, and that they got recycled to soon.
There is no time unless someone is measuring the process, like counting moments, instead of just living. Try a long slow count, like whole seasons on earth, or relax completely in the universal season of now and the horror of (to soon) will go away.
This is the secret. (unless evil is real)
Don't be a cop. Don't be a time cop. Don't be a judge. Don't be a jailer, and don't wish for cops and judges and jailers to get anyone.
Relax, and wish for something beautiful, or at least more beautiful than retribution.
That will be $35.95, no checks please, (cash is king.) -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, October 28, 2009 - 7:56 PM
Love was here before it happened, love was here while it was happening, and love will be here still when it's done happening.
Love is here.
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Thu, October 29, 2009 - 9:54 PMWow there is a whole lot of hostility floating around this topic. I too wonder if that energy couldn’t be directed in a more productive direction. I was thinking, just maybe there is something to learn from this tragic event.
If, just if, the passing of these people opened up a conversation that goes beyond the ripping off of Native American Spirituality (as if anyone can own spirituality) or the idea that someone needs to pay dearly for this (as if revenge evens the score and makes everything better) … then perhaps the price these people paid with their lives would have been, in some way, a gift to all of us.
Let’s go ahead and head off the idea right here that I wouldn’t sue Ray. I would absolutely. So don’t even go there. But money doesn’t hold nearly the same value as a life changing lesson. No lesson is actually learned without unemotional processing of the whole picture.
So far, I have seen plenty of discussion on what Ray did or didn’t do which include presumptions on “his” motivation. I thought I might add a few more pieces to the picture that I seem to be pondering.
What were the motivations of the people attending this little get together? Were they just looking for some spiritual enlightenment? Next week I’ll be going to see a different author featured in The Secret. That is going to cost me a whopping $25 and guess what? His book comes with the ticket. If this author were charging $11,000 (and no book lol) would that mean he is more enlightened then James Ray? Obviously not. People who have ten grand laying around to drop on a little enlightenment aren’t ignorant of this fact. But, evenso, I don’t expect to see a single one of them at my event next week. Why? Because it is not worth $10,000 to them to rub elbows with me. Some people think it is, but they are usually broke. This gathering was likely a bit more about a networking chance of a life time than about any sort of enlightenment. As such, it was a business trip.
So now these people are on the business trip of their life sitting in a sweat lodge. Who is going to be the first to say “I’m outta here” ? I attend Inipi Ceremony regularly. Lodge is my church. I have been in plenty of lodges where touristy kind of people just want to check it out. I don’t think I’ve ever been in this type of lodge where someone didn’t leave at the first open door or at least by the second. I have been taught and I do believe, that is okay! I used to have to check myself at this annoyance of someone else interrupting “my” experience but I think I’ve grown to accept these people are just taking care of themselves. I have absolutely no right to judge them or to presume what they are experiencing in “my” church. Anyway, I’ve spoken to a number of these people who bailed early and there was always one common thread running through all of them. It was a feeling that they were weak. Now imagine sitting in Lodge rubbing sweaty elbows with incredibly influential and powerful people. Are you really going to be the first to announce you are too weak for this? We are not just talking about 10 or 20 people here. We are talking about more than 60 who will probably financially impact your life.
Ya know, when I hear or read something that Chief Arvol Looking Horse has to say, I always have to take a deep breath and get ready for it. We seldom agree and I have my own issues with him. But about this whole Arizona affair he did hit on something I absolutely agree with and may also be a point of consideration. He said “When you do ceremony, you can not have money on your mind. We deal with the pure sincere energy to create healing that comes from everyone in that circle of ceremony. The heart and mind must be connected. When you involve money, it changes the energy of healing. The person wants to get what they paid for.”
I wonder how many people sat there near death waiting for the spiritual experience so many others of us have experienced because that’s what they paid for.
Just a few thoughts. There are a few others, but that’s what pondering is all about. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 4:58 AMThe "hostility" is motivated at the justified anger that people have at Mr. Ray. He is using spirituality as a way to make a quick buck. In fact I will call his "spirituality" a joke and a sham. I extend him no more consideration in this manner than I would if three people had died on an amusment park ride that Ray had kept in bad repair. As an aside I believe anger is a legitimate and healthy part of being human. In fact I prize and celebrate my ability to feel anger. Like all emotions what counts is what we do with them.
The families of the three victims are entitled to their anger of coure: www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009...48060.shtml
NEW YORK (CBS/AP) The daughter of Liz Neuman, a Prior Lake, Minn. woman who died after participating in an Arizona sweat-lodge ceremony said she wants New Age guru James Arthur Ray behind bars.
And I give myself the right to cheer that Ray is canceling his scheduled events: www.cnn.com/2009/US/10/2...lodge.deaths/
Like I said before this is no loss at all to those who practice real spirituality -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 7:33 AMWho can own spirituality? Put that way it lets us off the hook for a total lack of respect for Native American spirituality. When Europeans in North America (most of us here) continue to use Native traditions despite their wishes not to it is just a continuation of the shit we did to them during the western expansion. We should find our own traditions and honor the wishes of Native Peoples that we quit dabbling in what is sacred to them.
I consider myself in solidarity with this:www.puffin.creighton.edu/lakota/war.html
and this:newagefraud.org/
It has always been disrespectful to rip off Native American traditions like the sweat lodge, but now in the hands of hucksters and charlatans like James Ray if has become fatal for some participants. Maybe some bad karma coming back to bite us in the butt.
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 10:04 AMFor those who would like to know how Sweat Lodges work, here is a good introduction:
adventure.howstuffworks.com/swea...e.htm
NOTE: "In the United States, sweat lodges are largely associated with Native American tradition. But they've been seen in cultures around the world. Ancient stone buildings in Ireland suggest they appreciated the benefits of sweating -- same thing in rural China, Russia and Mongolia, and the Polish make use of sweat lodges in folk medicine. The oldest sweat lodge evidence dates back to 5 B.C. It appears that the Scythians, a nomadic group that populated today's southern Russia, constructed sweat lodges from poles and woven cloth."
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 10:18 AMRay is not the first teacher person to push some to death. Indigenous shamans have done so also. It happens as rarely as with people like Ray. What about the indigenous Shamans that have killed students with Jimsonweed? John Perkins knows a shaman down in Ecuador that has a practice of taking his apprentices into a volcanic vent and making them stay in there with him. He has killed several of his followers doing this. It is an interesting contrast with the two cultures. Down in the jungle there is no outrage or anger at this shaman for doing this. Is it because tribal people in the jungle care less about life than western European culture? Maybe it is comparing apples to oranges but tribal people in the jungle are a lot more accepting of death. Mostly because they have to be. Given the means to do so they would fight for life as much as anyone else. Personally, I would never push anyone to point of serious harm but the world is a lot bigger than me. There maybe situations where that is what the people involved want to do. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 10:40 AMRay is not a "teacher person" he is not a shaman he is a sham, a con artist and a business man with zero ethics. It is astonishing that people are letting the little weasel off the hook. The outrage is 100% justified. The little crook, Ray put people in a dangerous situation by building a sweat lodge using plastic tarps, he tried to prevent people who were becoming ill from leaving and then acts like he is a victim and to boot offers the families half of their money back. The man is a narcissist who seems to take himself so seriously that the people he killed are an annoyance and hinderence to his little scam that he calims to be spirituality. The difference between those in the jungle who are teachers is that they are teachers and Ray is a charlatan who does not know what he is doing.
To hell with James Aurthor Ray. I pary for the collapse of his business and that the loved ones of those he killed obtain all of his ill gotten wealth. I am not the only one engaged in such prayer and wishing with intent that Ray is finished once and for all. He did as much damage to real spirituality and to people as the priests who molest children. He even seems to have supporters who would let him get away with murder. I agree with the daughter of one of the victims who wishes Ray behind bars. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:00 AMYes, yes, Harold, the guy is an irresponsible fool. I don't believe one person here has defended him. You are so focused on wishing him ill that you are completely missing the point of what people are bringing up and repeating yourself over and over.
There are some great disdcussions and potential for discussions here that you are basically missing because you are very caught up in your anger. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:38 AM"There are some great disdcussions and potential for discussions here that you are basically missing because you are very caught up in your anger. "
Exactly! I count about 5 different awsome discussions. Possibly 6 if we include anger management. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 12:07 PMI think the anger management thing has become hogwash. It is just another way to control people because rather than working with people to channel anger in a constructive way people are getting the message that anger itself is a bad thing. It is not. There are issues and events that produce anger and it is useless to tell people "don't be angry."
This issue hits home with me because I did one day express my anger over a situation at work. I did not yell at anyone or threaten anyone I simply told a supervisor that a decision that he took made me angry. The supervisor told the boss and the boss told me that as a condition me remaining employed I would need to go to an anger management class. This made me royally pissed. Happily we have a good strong union where I work and the union attorney sent a letter that told the boss that it would not be appropriate to require me to go given the circumstances of my conversation with the supervisor. The boss backed down and I continue to work there and no anger management class was required. It pays to have a good union on your side.
As I stated before I do not see anger as being some pariah emotion that is different than other human emotions. We have a right to matter of factly be angry and expressing that we are angry and not have to face sanctions for it. Anger can lead to taking action to change a situation. In the case of th fatal sweat lodge that tragedy could lead to other people being more careful and cause people seeking spirituality to ask critical or skeptical questions of teachers. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:08 PM"In the case of th fatal sweat lodge that tragedy could lead to other people being more careful and cause people seeking spirituality to ask critical or skeptical questions of teachers."
Let's hope so. That's the best that can come from this.
No doubt there will be many more seekers after wisdom and liberation. Good for them to look carefully at this event and hopefully as you say ask questions.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:19 PMHi Harold. I think you have a good point that anger is a natural reaction. However, unchecked anger is the gateway to hatred and can permanently change a person's personality. After the initial reaction of anger the realization should come that everyone makes mistakes because they have incarnated in order to learn. So, after the initial anger healing is what is needed. Punishment in most of it's aspects is a perverted idea that is born of ethical thinking. We should be more concerned about restoring harmony than obtaining justice. People always say they feel better that a criminal who hurt them is behind bars even though their heart has been torn out and remains damaged. Forgiveness for a sincere apology and prayer to take care of the rest should be what we are focusing on. Though, of course, that would not make for interesting reading or a block buster movie. Aloha, Kahuna Lamaku. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:41 PMAnger is not a bad thing...CHRONIC anger is dangerous and damaging, however.
ariesmoon.tribe.net/thread/0...a42939e3e
I agree that Punishment can be detrimental, but I do think that those judged as Criminals by a community need to make restitution for their crimes.
Some people who are chronic criminals need to somehow be limited in the amount of harm they can visit upon others, especially harm to those who are innocent.
If a Shaman is harming people, then the community of Shamans need to come together and somehow stop the harm from being done.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 10:55 AMFiredragon4u,
Its clear from accounts that the people had a reasonable expectation of due care and safety. It is also clear that people did not want to die and were psychologically coerced into remaining in the dangerous situation when *they attempted to leave*.
When one of them tried to increase the ventilation by opening a flap, he was severely verbally reprimanded and the flap was re-closed.
Attempts to remove and get medical attention for unconscious victims were deliberately interfered with.
To suggest that they wanted to be in such a life threatening situation is a gross insult to the families of the dead, as well as those who survived.
I can't believe you would suggest that they wanted to be in that situation. Did you even bother reading the accounts of the survivors before posting this outrageous accusation?
Regards,
Ryan -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:04 AMI have guess about why a few people are defending Ray. I thnk they put themselves in his shoes as a "teacher" who has all the answers and who should never be questioned even if lives are endangered. I can think of no teacher ever who should not have their judgement questioned. If that is how anyone wishes to be treated then I suggest you get out of spiritual practice and become a prison guard or something. Al; shamans and teachers should be questioned. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:06 AM"Al; shamans and teachers should be questioned."
There you go, bottom line. We each must be responsible for ourselves. Great point, Harold.
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:57 AMRyan I never said what you said it did. But what is interesting is what Harold said. He said that Ray is not a shaman as if it would have made a difference if he were. It is wrong for a card carrying credentialed shaman ,or whatever criteria you think makes a shaman a real shaman, to push people like the way Ray did. And it does happen although rarely to death. Conman or legitimate no one wants to die trying to improve them self. Ray is in big trouble, as he should be, and hope this detours others from doing the same thing. Other people have been scalded and hurt in sweats also. Sweat lodges do not need to be so harsh to be affective. People should always be free to leave if they feel they have reached their limit. In the sweats I have been in no one would say anything about leaving. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 12:07 PM>Ryan I never said what you said it did.
Oh really? Here is a direct quote:
"I would never push anyone to point of serious harm but the world is a lot bigger than me. There maybe situations where that is what the people involved want to do."
If that isn't suggesting that they might have wanted to put themselves in harms way, what does it suggest? -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:18 PMNo Ryan the context is everything and every situation going on in this world. Nobody wants to die taking jimsonweed yet people are willing to take their chances with it anyway. There are teachers world wide, through may belief systems, who put their students in risky situations. I wouldn't do it but I am not them. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:56 PMSo the people you were talking about included "everything and every situation" but -not- Ray and his students? Do I have that correct?
OK, if that is really what you meant, then I apologize to you. I am sure you can see why your statement appeared to mean something else entirely. Thank you for clarifying.
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 2:00 PMUnless they were physically being restrained by others, then they had a choice.
I haven't read the survivors reports, but I will if I can find them. If the situation wasn't healthy why would they stay in it? What priority did they give to staying the course inside the sweat that overruled their sense of well being or impending harm? Who did they give away the power of decision to? When did they stop becoming the primary decision maker about their own welfare and why?
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 2:36 PM>When did they stop becoming the primary decision maker about their own welfare and why?
Social pressure is an amazingly powerful force. Research has shown that the majority of well adjusted "normal" people will actually engage in quite brutal torture of other human beings simply because they were told to by somebody "in authority". So I have no problem believing that people could be shamed/pressured into staying without being physically restrained.
In fact, I can see myself being shamed/pressured into staying in a bad situation, but if anyone attempted stop me physically, they very likely would need to be prepared to use "lethal force" in order to succeed.
Unless somebody is extremely easy to over-power, social pressure is almost always going to be the most effective method of controlling people's movements
Seems odd, but its true,
Ryan -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 8:27 PMOkay, social pressure is powerful, and yet those participants are still responsible for themselves. They gave thousands of dollars and then sort of turned off their own power of decision, or maybe gave the responsibility for their well being away because they had paid so much money. For whatever reason, they chose to place themselves in someone's care who didn't have their well being as his first priority. And then they chose to be guided by those in authority even though their bodies were shutting down.
I was in the military once for a very brief time. I went in to find out some things about how they coerce you into committing insane actions because my father had been in and was deeply affected by what he eventually did to the enemy in Korea. I wanted to understand the social pressure he was under and also the way they made it stick. Once I had, which took very little time, I left. Against all that pressure and the threats of being put in jail I made a plan and escaped. It was the largest induction center in the USA and I was led to believe that going a-wall would lead directly to military prison. Once out I went to see a lawyer to find out what my options were. The moment I entered his office with my questions I was in a new category called, Counseled To Resolve. No one ever told me that was an option, certainly not the military. All those people who went a-wall and hid out for all those years actually only needed to talk to a lawyer or a priest and they would have been in that same category. The real power wasn't really in the social pressure the military exerted, but inside of me. My faith in my rights, even in the face of serious attempts to sway me otherwise, was the more true power.
It's ironic and tragic that in a course on being a spiritual warrior the participants chose a submissive and victimized position to authority and social pressure, even unto the point of death. What's warrior like about that?
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 7:12 PMWhy might they stay? Promise of a "spiritual" experience? Loss of higher brain function due to the heat, lack of oxygen and dehydration? Thinking you could get over feeling so bad if you just persevere and break through? I can think of lots of reasons. That's why the well being of the people in a lodge is the responsibility of the lodge uncle. I was in a sweat once where too many rocks were brought in and when the water was poured it got way too hot way too fast. The lodge leader yelled for the flap to be opened and for everyone to get out as fast as possible. That was a responsible act (though perhaps to an irresponsible situation). In this case the people who died died because and only because of the irresponsibility of one person. What his fault and responsibility in this matter will ultimately be judged in a court of law and in the Court of Heaven. Personally, I hope Ray gets to spend a long time thinking about his motivations and responsibilities from a cot in a small cell. I can search my heart all I want to but I cannot find any excuse for his incompetent actions.
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:04 AMFire, I think that's all nonesense. Jungle Shaman or U'S. charleton, being irresponsible with other's lives is an outrage and unacceptable. Period. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 12:36 PMDeath is quite a price to pay for enlightenment..
Awel.. all those people who died will never live again..
Well...Not as they used to remember..
But sure their suffering is over... haha... (death is a joke)
And isn't it those people's own responsibility to know what they can handle..?
Perhaps they were just to stupid to live.. to eager to die..
It is dangerous to become attached to megalomaniacs.. or narcicists for that matter..
Like... what was their intentions to go into a dangerous ceremony...
Healing..? Becoming a shaman...? Visions..?
Their isn't such at hing as a shaman..
It's a joke..a lie.. an illusion...
Because people can only understand lies...
And if it takes a lie to make one feel better, they are just to weak to handle any truth..
They are to weak to handletheir own self.. They acn't fight and are afraid of confronting their fears..
I'm glad those people are dead..
Not dancing around my kitchen chair happy.... but...
It shows again that people (in general) are stupid, sheepfull, morons who will believe just anything that they are handed.. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 2:18 PM
"I'm glad those people are dead.. " Not really helpful or considerate Geert.
I doubt it's something you gave much thought to before saying, and if you did you may be in for some feedback. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:37 PMI'm not a considerate guy...
I am not a nice fellow...
I lie constantly.. that way people know the truth..
If you know I lie.. and I know you are lying we can share way more then just superficial trivialities based on fale moral principles..
All these talk and crap.. it doesn't matter..
Ooohoo.. what should we think of this..
Death is a joke..
Personally I would rather be eaten by cannibals then suffocating in a sweaty tent with twenty desperate white males hungry for some stimulation..
Pkease recognize the cynic asshole .. and laugh.. it is the only way..
Sure.. I'm sorry for their relatives... but sjeesj.... cmon....
You know how many people die every day of starvation...?
How many bombs are thrown on innocent people....
I don't have time to worry for some fat rich white asshole with a snake stuck in his ass...
I'm through thanks...I got worrying enough to do... -
-
I don't have time to worry for some fat rich white asshole with a snake stuck in his ass...
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 11:52 PMlol -
-
Re: Boycot.
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:52 AMI fail to see the humor in denigrating someone because of their race or wealth or lack of wealth.
So called rich white guys are the new Satan. It's fair to say that most people don't really believe in the devil, but do believe in evil and that the rich fat white guy is the favored place to put that nasty mantle. The greedy corporate devil.
It's about as useful as it was to believe in Satan and then go around putting to death anyone in whom he was thought to reside, and about as mature as that as well. If you sufficiently degrade someone just about any atrocity committed against them is acceptable and is sanctioned by the preservation of all that is so called holy. -
-
Re: Boycot.
Mon, November 2, 2009 - 7:19 PM -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Boycot.
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 4:48 AMHaHa!! Lovit' thank you embrace hehehe
Bliss!
Nobu +
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:59 AM
Whenever I hear, "it is the only way" Geert, I turn around and go one of the other thousand possible ways. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:08 PMCG said: " ..... and wanted to be led by someone smarter, more spiritual etc."
The trouble is that Ray is obviously not smarter or anywhere near being more spiritual. He is just a slick and slimy con man who can convince people to fork over thousands of dollars to hear a lot of recycled new age platitudes. As for his followers it is another example of what P.T. Barnum meant when he said a sucker is born every minute. Except now there appears to be one born every few seconds.
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:19 PM"The trouble is that Ray is obviously not smarter or anywhere near being more spiritual."
Down boy. We know how you feel about the man, Harold. You've made it abundantly clear.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:25 PM"As for his followers it is another example of what P.T. Barnum meant when he said a sucker is born every minute. Except now there appears to be one born every few seconds."
Right, what does that tell you? If people are willing to offer lots of money for it then obviously it means more to them than their money. Was it wealth they were after or spiritual liberation?
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:34 PMIn this culture, we seem to think there is a quick fix for everything. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 3:02 PMBig mistake thinking money could purchase spiritual liberation' it puts a real twist on of what folks idea about spirit and self enlightenment is!
I paid ten grand for my initiation' so it has to be better than yours' cos your's cost no thing' n' I had to work for 5 years to save the monies' of where you just worked with a healer for 5 years getting "High"
Bliss!
Nobu +
Anyone who says'
Balance is bogus!
Is bogus themselves in my book'
He twittered'
JamesARay: is still in Spiritual Warrior… for anything new to live something first must die. What needs to die in you so that new life can emerge?
JamesARay: Day 5 of SPW. The Spiritual Warrior has conquered death and therefore has no enemies, and no fear, in this life or the next.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 1:34 PMThere are obviously many ways to view this situation. Ultimately, though, it is good to bring it to the attention of people who may put themselves in harm's way. It is also good for those of us who teach others and lead and guide others....good for us to remember that we have a GREAT responsibility to treat those in our care with respect and love.
Spirituality does not mean giving up one's free will.
See #17 in The Advanced Bonewits’ Cult Danger Evaluation Frame:
www.neopagan.net/ABCDEF.html
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 5:29 PM -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:06 AMJust heartbreaking.
I do hope ray spends a very long time in prison and that his personal fortune gets distributed to all of the poor people and their families who participated in this travesty. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:35 AM"I do hope ray spends a very long time in prison and that his personal fortune gets distributed to all of the poor people and their families who participated in this travesty."
That's the most likely scenario. The lawsuits have already started, two I believe, so far. No doubt there will be lots more to come. He could save himself some grief later were he to provide counseling and whatever care those people need now, whatever the cost. But aparently his thinking has't been and still is not about the well being of those people.
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 11:57 AMHe's just a guy who wants very much to be in charge, to be the teacher, the shaman, etc. and those people who joined him did so freely and wanted to be led by someone smarter, more spiritual etc.
The dynamic had as much to do with the deaths as Ray did.
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:02 PMIndeed. But again, don't underestimate the loss of reason that can come not only with putting oneself "under" someone else's care, but also with heat prostration, exhaustion, oxygen deficiency, CO2 excess, delirium, and unconsciousness. In this case I personally would place the onus on Ray and not on the attendees who very likely could not respond rationally to the situation. Add to that, people were not allowed to leave when the door was closed. 15 minutes is a very long time when your body is losing it's ability to stay alive. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:13 PMNot top meantion very powerful hypnotic techniques. And don't underestimate them, they bring in billions of dollars for a lot of people).
I agree, CG, that the dynamics had a lot to do with it. Everyone is culpable in those circumstances. Would be good for this incident to inspire individuals to question and research more, take better charge of themselves.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 8:28 PMI agree he was a lousy caretaker and worse "leader" and that he's responsible for his part in it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 5:45 PMThis explains a lot about why all those people did not leave or help one another:
www.youtube.com/watch -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Fri, October 30, 2009 - 7:11 PMI agree that people are too willing to follow authority, but the onus for this belongs on the people who told them not to leave and kept the place closed up. What sort of bloated ego does it take to tell people that they should ignore the warning signs that their own bodies are giving them? Personally I can't think of anybody who could tell me that I am really not getting sick when clearly my body says otherwise.
A more extreme example of people being willing to follow authority was Heaven's Gate. It takes some major gullibility to believe some nobody telling you a spaceship is hiding behind a comet. It must take a major lack of brains to follow his instructions to castrate themselves and then take poison so that he approaching ship can come and get them. 39 stupid people who will not reproduce. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:10 PMWhile the heavens gate or even any fundamentalist or evangelical movement was far more serious than ray's "seminar", the techniques used in both reek of cult indoctrination.
1) Subjection to stress and fatigue
2) Social disruption, isolation and pressure
3) Self criticism and humiliation
4) Fear, anxiety, and paranoia
5) Control of information
6) Escalating commitment
7) Use of auto-hypnosis to induce "peak" experiences
I can't help but be reminded of the rigors of Peruvian shamanic training which includes all of the above in the dieta process. I'm not saying it's a cult at all, but the danger does exist for abuse by charismatic "shamans"; something we all need to be aware and wary of.
Add to that nutrition deprivation - the poor people in ray's seminar had just come off of four days of total fasting - and you have brains and bodies that are not functioning properly at all. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:16 PM"the poor people in ray's seminar had just come off of four days of total fasting - and you have brains and bodies that are not functioning properly at all."
Right and they broke the fast with a huge meal I understand. What kind of reaction is the body going to have to that?
When you think about it it just looks more and more twisted. Very strange.
Doesn't common sense tell you not to break a fast with lots of food? -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:26 PMThis raises a very fundamental question about weather or not people need gurus, shamans, clergy, etc. at all. Maybe the best thing we can do is to encourage others to find their own individual path to spiritual enlightenment. It certianly should not involve the need to pay anybody since the information already exists out there. We need not pay anybody for rituals. The most important lessons I have learned were ones I never had to pay any money for at all. The best teachers never asked for a penny. IMHO God, The Goddes or Spirit has no need for an army of paid middlemen. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 12:31 PM"God, The Goddes or Spirit has no need for an army of paid middlemen."
Very good point. Yet I feel it is very powerful to put oneself in the hands of a teacher. It's excellent practice for subduing the ego. And if your ego is as unruly as mine you can appreciate such things.
Why do they have to be mutually exclusive? To be in charge of ones own spiritual development and to sit at the feet and devote oneself to a guru?
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sat, October 31, 2009 - 3:30 PMIt's so delicate and part of the problem is that our culture is bomb arded with media ideas about what a guru or a shaman are.
I do think it's necessary to have a teacher or a guide since the territory of the mind and heart are so tricky and it's quite easy to get side-tracked or confused. The whole new age movement to me is based on a bunch of ideas that were just off. As is "the secret" and all of the confusion and pain that has caused. The path is one of surrendering ego without surrendering reason or discrimination. But what is ego, what is reason, what is discrimination? Do most "seekers" (gods I hate that term) really know? I think not. We hear an idea, for example the current rage "goddess". Each person is going to have their own idea about what that means, based on their upbringing, background, needs, wants, conceptions, etc. Replace goddess with any other word and the same things will be there. IMNVHO, a true teacher has done the work, walked the path, learned the differences, and has the wisdom to help the student avoid the serious pitfalls while taking them by the metaphorical hand as they walk along the path. The true teacher is within, for sure, but how many relally know where and what it is?
We're a gullible easily manipulated people. Not stupid, but not wise either. At least not yet. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 2:44 AMThat's because we're all hypnotized and walking around in a trance. Our minds are continous monkey chatter. And I challenge anyone reading this to tell me any different. You know you are like this or have been.
The first and most important effort folks need to make is toward clearing the mind and waking up, isn't it?
Not adding more nonesense upon dogma, upon conditioning, upon imprinting, indoctrination, trauma.
I pray for all our awakening. We must all wake up. Nobody's paying much attention. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 7:03 AMembrace.,i hear you.,people need to wake up.,.,less dogma.,more action -
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 11:17 AMI fail to see the humor in that pun.. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 11:19 AMI doubt it's something you gave much thought to before saying. -
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 12:20 PM
I think you are complex, and also considerate and nice.
"But the dreams keep coming...
Tonight they dream...
How they miss their mothers..
That first kiss of welcome...
Is the most important...
When you know you have a good soul...
Crystal clear....
Without a doubt you bring..
.. a diamond..
That shines bright..
No fear for death..
No fear for life..." -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 1:24 PMCG--and i love my dreams--and your complex and a gentleman.,
i liked your--i love my dog--that spoke in many layers--its funny how someone would take offense at that
i love my dogs--all three of them.,.,and i bless the day each one of them found me--Geez -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 3:34 PMIt was a joke.. pickerrick...
I copy pasted his own words back to him..
Geez...
I love dogs too....
Dogs, babies and jellyfish... -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 4:08 PM
hehe.,thats a good one
and jellyfish.,i take things too literally sometimes-thanks
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 11:37 AM"i hear you.,people need to wake up"
Right, you need to wake up.
I need to wake the fuck up.
Not "people." It's not out there in people. It's in here, in my heart. In my thinking. We can't always let ourselves off the hook so easy.
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 9:16 PMI was watching an interesting report on a high school in the worst district in the USA in Detroit. A lottery was held and the winners, regardless of background, race or previous grades was allowed in if they passed a standard test. %100 of the kids attending graduated and went on to collage in a school system that was only graduating 32 percent from high school.
The environment was the difference. The guidance and teachers. Teachers and leaders can make the crucial difference. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Sun, November 1, 2009 - 10:36 PMHi CG. Interesting study. It's too bad the curriculum doesn't help turn them into caring human beings. That could be the only thing missing in turning the world on it's head. This wisdom often comes later in life. In a life as casual as most of ours we can afford to learn it slowly. In the past, people had to care much more about each other when every day was a struggle to stay alive. Society's priorities have changed over the decades because of marketing and politics. Instead of healers gaining respect they are ignored or looked upon as a curiosity. Money has become king and love has been reduced to a peasant. I know I'm being melodramatic but, I had to say something and it came out as a complaint. Sorry about that. Aloha, Kahuna Lamaku. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Mon, November 2, 2009 - 3:41 AMastute observervence Kahuna.,your on the money about the money being king.,
and healers-shaman looked upon as curiosities.,
society has changed.,the care factor--caring for each other has changed dramatically--
our leaders and teachers have gone way of track--
and thats the big problem right there--RESPECT
kahuna.,your so right about wisdom.,learning it slowly and later in life--
its because we have to learn it on our own--
our system is a system of lies--overlapping half-truths that thru mans law-reality can be manipulated and mangled be4yond recognition.,
people learn the rules--or not--and break them anyways.,just saying that in genaral-not everyones a crook
we need better teachers.,and leaders--nuff said
bless the people -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Mon, November 2, 2009 - 6:39 AMthemoderatevoice.com/51057/j...operate/
Form the article linked above about how cults operate
"A warrant to search Mr. James Ray’s offices in California was issued immediately, apparently seeking to confiscate his computers, registrations records, and medical records of retreat participants. According to some participants of the deadly retreat, Mr. Ray recently apologized by phone to some of them, for not having been there the next morning after the deaths and hospitalizations “to provide closure” for the participants… as he had left the premises in Arizona the evening of the tragedies and without notice to the participants, flew home to California instead."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Mon, November 2, 2009 - 2:03 PMI got to say it'
My Karma ran over my Dogma. :)
I love my dogs' Love folks' Love Mi' Love my wife' Love'
Bliss!
Nobu + -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 12:18 PMNot to bring it up again but I pulled this from a blog of a person I know. Any thoughts?
"As one reads the details of this heartbreaking story and listens to the accounts of those who survived it, one is thrown again and again to the same, haunting question: How could a group of intelligent individuals have abdicated their own good sense to such an extent?
The dialogue that could have put an early end to the destructive and ultimately fatal collusion was neither permitted by the workshop attendants nor demanded by the participants. And we see in this that, given a certain convergence of chaotic factors, the ego that refuses to heed the inner voice can be fatal. Fate can flash in an irremediable instant from which there is no turning back.
This is a sobering and painful reminder of what it means to be living in a world we do not control, and the terrible price that may be exacted for presuming otherwise. Further, the tragedy makes clear what can happen when we abdicate our responsibility to the inner self, assigning the authority of our intuition to someone else. When a “guru” is elevated to the status of the gods—a James Arthur Ray or David Koresh or Jim Jones—tragedy is inevitable. It is only a matter of time."
*This is coming from the stance of, being in friendly relation with fate and chaos in not trying to upstage the gods/Universe/God or whatever that is for you. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 1:35 PMAye.,thats true Hubris.,and right on track.,Thanks
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 4:03 PMI think that writing does border a bit on "blame the victim". -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 6:17 PMWhat is the difference between James Ray and the Victim, in consciousness?
"When a “guru” is elevated to the status of the gods—a James Arthur Ray or David Koresh or Jim Jones—tragedy is inevitable. It is only a matter of time."
Could it be the same thing? James Ray elevating himself to the status of the gods/Victim elevating James Ray to the status of the gods. Remember, I am asking from the perspective "in consciousness". -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Tue, November 3, 2009 - 7:56 PMI'm not actually clear on what you mean by "in consciousness". Maybe you can clarify.
I don't think, in this case, the victims elevated Ray to the status of a god. They just trusted him and he betrayed their trust. If you're in an airplane you trust the pilot. Similar (well sort of) idea.
As I mentioned above, we can't really look at this and say that they, the victims, should have reacted. We don't know if they were even capable of doing so. Fasting, feasting, high heat, oxygen deprivation, dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, etc. can wreck havoc on the mind and on judgment and on the ability to logically respond to a situation. Add to that the hypnotic manipulation that Embrace mentioned and the onus is on Ray. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 4:53 AMThere are many levels of Hubris. I idea here is to know your limits. "in consciousness" is where those decision are made. This is not about assigning blame for me. It is about taking responsibility in general. Even if you are going to forgo a complicated surgery, you are told what the risks are, and will typically be asked to sign a release form (taking responsibility). A doctor is a trained professional and you understand that. However, even with a doctor there are limits to what most people will let them do.
Mr. Ray operated outside of his limits. He will probably be sued and possibly prosecuted. That is how we do it in American. Everyone will have their justice on some level. The point is - the dialogue did not happen between James Ray and his "students". Many if not most surrendered to a man despite what their inner voice was probably telling them. Even if you are a "yes man" you are allowed to say "yes" to your "no".
I believe there needs to be more training, if we must be trained, in when is it time to say "no" to a belief or ritual. Where are the boundaries set?
None of us will ever know for sure how we would have reacted that day. But from this point forward, I bet everyone that participated in this thread will know what to do or not do. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 8:10 AMYou could argue that up to a certain point the people attending Ray's event were responsible for giving over their power to Ray. The point where that breaks down is the second that Ray told a person who was becoming sick not to leave. Ray then closed an opening that air could enter and apparently had others try to prevent people from leaving. At that point the onus was 100% on James Ray. What sort of spiritual leader puts his own selfish need for authority and control above the well being of others? If I were someone that others considered to be a teacher the first lesson I would impart would be to discourage devotion to any authority. Independence of thought should be a primary goal. Subordination of will and action should be rejected. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 8:49 AMI am in agreement when it comes to the will. But it wasn't a hostage situation. There were 60 students that couldn't overcome Ray's charm and his few staff members because they couldn't reconize their own authority.
Again, setting up the ritual with clear boundries should have been the key. The "certain point" where my seeming arguement breaks down is when you insert the mind. If we are truley looking at this thread from a spiritual stance we have to understand from beyond the mind. "The Mind" caused the deaths. My understanding says there were many "Minds" involved, (60 - plus).
Many people, everyday die of faith. There were countless cases during the new age movement in the 70's where people with serious illnesses chose "consciousness as cause" models over traditional treatment and died as a result. Tragic, just like this incident.
I guess the question for me is: When will we as individual spirits evolve to the point where we are living from the inside out? What is happening through us opposing what is happening to us.
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 9:30 AM"If I were someone that others considered to be a teacher the first lesson I would impart would be to discourage devotion to any authority. Independence of thought should be a primary goal. Subordination of will and action should be rejected."
Right, and look at all the subordination of will that goes on. To the media, to corporations, the government, the state, the doctors, our communities, and families. You're talking some radical spiritual anarchy! lol Self-autonomy uber alles! -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 9:53 AMNot to defend what he did or anything like that, but just want to point out that there are many different traditions for the sweat lodge. I dont know what tradition James learned and was conducting, but some traditions dont allow anybody to leave the lodge until the flap was raised. Now, personally I dont know how somebody can safely or even conduct a ceremony with so many people. It seems to be a common practice to use a tarp as well for the construction of the lodge, something im sure many will now evaluate as to wheter it is a good practice or not. Plus, I would say that it would be difficult to hold that space for so many people. Everybody can say that he should have had better common sense, he should have done this and that... I would just say that he is in an interesting space right now where he will have to re-evaluate the way in which he conducts his ceremonies and that I dont envy his lesson he will be learning from this tragic event. A difficult journey he has placed himself on. Just my two cents... -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 1:03 PMEmbrace - Yes! Radical, radical responsibility. You said the same thing earlier basically "Wake up!" Same thing.
MJ - nice that you acknowledged the interesting space this man must be in.
Harold - Love the idea that if you were a teacher you would place a student on a level that would let them grow the best they can. -
-
Re: Boycott James Arthur Ray
Wed, November 4, 2009 - 1:05 PMAlso, this thread just exceeded 100 replies. Thanks for starting it Harold.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-